Yesterday, in his campaign’s innaugural town hall, Bernie Sanders (I-VT) gave his compelling yet albeit shallow plan to provide healthcare, education and income to the American people. Needless to say, he admitted the plan would raise tax dollars, but of course it would garauntee ‘free’ everything at the expense of disposable income for the general public.
Of course, he gave no annumeration for the plan, who would get what, and how it would be deployed. He just promised free everything that anyone could want, because it’s a ‘right’. It’s interesting to see that at least some of the public would fall for this notion that anything they want is a right. Has consumerism, instagram bragging, and 24/7 reality shows created a monster of the American people?
Unfortunately for Bernie, a constitutional democratic republic isn’t supposed to be giving out these types of goodies. In my journey to becoming the Disgruntled American, my main justification was for the need of civic education among the masses. Government was never intended to take care of it’s people, it’s only goal was to provide the infrastructure necessary for prosperity. This may confuse alot of people, especially socialists, who think that they’re owed the world for merely surviving.
John Locke, who many call the Father of (classical) Liberalism, made it clear that the government can only do one thing, either protect property and stay aloof from the affairs of it’s citizens in order to allow prosperity or to directly care for it’s citizens and eschew protection. It cannot do both, as it will do both poorly and will fail. He also believed, of which I am in the same camp, that the individual not the community is the basis for a government.
Alexis de Tocqueville, a french philosopher, came in the 1800s to this country to study our culture. In it, he made a revelation, “It’s not an endlessly expanding list of rights — the ‘right’ to education, the ‘right’ to health care, the ‘right’ to food and housing. That’s not freedom, that’s dependency. Those aren’t rights, those are the rations of slavery — hay and a barn for human cattle.”
My point is, children are dependent on their parents. They have limited rights, and when they wish for food it must be provided on their parents timeline. If they wish for better education, the parent’s must decide if they wish to provide it or if they have the monetary wherewithall to do so. If they wish for a doctor’s visit, it is up to the parent’s to decide if they will bring them. We are not children, we are adults and we are supposed to be able to take care of ourselves without anyone to do it for us.
You see, Locke and Tocqueville had a point, we are adults and we must put freedom above all or we will be begging the government for the bare necessities without the ability to pay for it ourselves. More government welfare means more taxes, and more taxes means less purchasing power in your pocket. The argument becomes “Capitalism isn’t fair”, not “Forcing someone else to pay for anything for me isn’t fair”. Freedom is a two edged sword, on one hand you can do whatever you would like, become as prosperous as you want to become or you can suffer due to mainly bad life decisions. Unfortunately, it is a person’s own responsibility to decide how they will live their life.
Begging the government isn’t freedom, begging for your next meal or begging for healthcare isn’t “gaming the system”, it’s no better than slavery; relying on someone else to provide for you when you’re just too lazy to do it isn’t freedom, it’s just pathetic.
Live Free // Die Free
The Disgruntled American